Best LLM SEO Analysis Software in 2026

Profound is built for brands that need to show AI visibility to leadership, not just to an SEO team. It tracks brand mentions, citations and competitor presence across AI answers, and adds prompt demand analysis that shows what buyers actually ask, including how one question fans out into related queries. That view helps content teams decide which topics to cover, rather than guessing from keyword volume alone. The platform also covers Google AI Overviews and other surfaces on higher tiers, which matters when buyers move between Google and standalone assistants. Pricing is quote-based, with entry comparisons listing around 99 dollars per month for some plans and far higher enterprise pricing, so treat any roundup price as a guide and request a quote for your prompt volume. Profound fits best when you have many prompts, many competitors and a need for regular reporting.

Peec AI is a dedicated AI search monitor, which means its whole product is about one job: showing where your brand appears in AI answers, which competitors get recommended, and which sources get cited. That focus makes it easier to learn than a full SEO suite, because the dashboard centres on prompts, answers, mentions and share of voice rather than on dozens of classic SEO modules. Entry pricing in comparisons is listed around 95 dollars per month, but current plans depend on prompts and engines, so check the Peec AI pricing page before you budget. Peec AI suits a marketing team that wants a specialist tracker and already has separate tools for keywords and links. It is less suited to a team that wants one login for all SEO work, since you will still need another tool for audits and backlinks.

Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit adds AI mention and AI Overview tracking to the Semrush platform, so teams can see AI data next to the keyword and content data they already use. That combination helps when an AI gap is really a content or link gap: you can check whether the cited competitor also ranks, links or covers the topic better, without exporting data between tools. Semrush pricing depends on plan and add-ons, and AI visibility may cost extra on some tiers, so check the current Semrush pricing page for the toolkit specifically. The toolkit fits best for in-house and agency teams already paying for Semrush who want to add AI tracking without a second vendor. If you only need AI tracking and nothing else, a dedicated tool such as Peec AI or Otterly.AI may cost less.

SE Ranking, also described as SE Visible in some guides, layers AI search tracking onto a classic SEO suite. It tracks mentions, links and citations across Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, Gemini, Perplexity and ChatGPT in vendor comparisons, with historical data and daily updates. That breadth is useful for agencies that need to report both classic ranks and AI presence to clients in one place. Pricing in comparisons ranges widely, with some API-focused roundups listing 318 dollars per month for AI visibility API access, while standard plans cost less. Treat those figures as guides and check the current SE Ranking pricing page for the AI toolkit, since prompt and keyword limits drive cost. SE Ranking fits agencies and SMB teams that want AI tracking without losing classic rank data.

Otterly.AI is the most accessible dedicated tracker on this list for a lean team or a single brand. It follows a simple workflow: add prompts, check answers across engines, see whether your brand or site is cited, and compare with competitors. A GEO audit feature helps teams spot content gaps that may explain why an AI answer cites a rival instead of you. Entry pricing in comparisons is listed from around 29 dollars per month, which is far lower than enterprise platforms, but current plans and engine add-ons can change that figure. Check the Otterly.AI pricing page for ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Copilot coverage, and note that Gemini and AI Mode may be add-ons. Otterly.AI is a good first tracker when you want real AI data without a large contract, and you can move to Profound or Peec AI later if prompt volume grows.

Ahrefs Brand Radar adds AI brand visibility to the Ahrefs platform, which is already strong for backlinks, keywords and content. That matters because AI answers often cite pages with strong topical coverage and links, so seeing AI mentions next to link and content data helps you diagnose why a competitor is cited. Teams that already use Ahrefs for audits can add AI tracking without learning a new data model. Ahrefs pricing starts at around 129 dollars per month for the base plan in comparisons, with Brand Radar and AI features varying by plan, so check the current Ahrefs pricing page. Brand Radar is not the cheapest way to track AI mentions alone, and its AI Overview coverage is narrower than some dedicated trackers. It fits best when Ahrefs is already your SEO system of record and AI data needs to sit next to link and content work.

Scrunch AI focuses on how AI answers cite brands and pages, and how that citation pattern compares with competitors. That focus helps content teams move from a vague goal such as get mentioned more to a specific task such as improve a page that rivals cite for a given prompt. The tool tracks answers across AI platforms and surfaces which sources appear, which is the core data an LLM SEO analysis needs. Pricing is not consistently published in roundups, so use See website and request current plan details for prompts, engines and reporting. Scrunch AI suits a team that already has a content plan and wants citation data to guide fixes. It is less suited to a team that needs classic rank tracking, site audits and backlink data in the same login, since you will need another tool for that work.

AthenaHQ appears in LLM tracking comparisons as a leaner AI visibility option, with scores for coverage, citations and actionability that place it near other specialist tools. It tracks brand presence in AI answers and helps teams compare with competitors, without the enterprise procurement and reporting weight of larger platforms. That makes it worth a trial for a small team that wants AI data but does not need board-level reporting. Because AthenaHQ is less widely covered than Profound or Semrush, check the current feature page and pricing page carefully before you commit, including which engines are included and how many prompts each plan covers. Use a trial to test prompt quality, answer storage and export, since those details matter more than a marketing claim about engine count. AthenaHQ fits a team that wants a specialist tracker at a lower operational cost and is willing to verify coverage during a trial.