Peec AI Alternatives in 2026

Profound is the enterprise answer in this category, tracking up to nine answer engines on its enterprise tier, including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, Grok and DeepSeek. It also connects AI crawler activity to analytics, so teams can see which AI traffic actually reaches their site. Content agents then turn tracking data into optimization recommendations and drafts.

That ceiling comes with enterprise buying: pricing is custom beyond the trial, and the trial itself covers a smaller engine set. Solo marketers and small teams will find Otterly or Rankscale easier to buy. Large brands that need full coverage and procurement-friendly reporting should shortlist Profound first.

Otterly is the budget pick that still feels like a real tool rather than a demo. At $29 per month, or $25 on annual billing, it tracks ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Copilot, with page-level GEO audits and AI crawler logs alongside prompt tracking. That combination suits solo marketers and small teams taking their first step into AI visibility.

The entry plan covers only 15 prompts, so a business with many products or locations will hit the limit fast. Extra engines cost more as add-ons. Start here to prove the value of AI tracking, then move up when your prompt list grows.

Scrunch, now part of Sitecore, pairs prompt tracking with AI-readiness site audits. Prompts are sorted by buyer-journey stage, which helps content teams see whether they win early research questions or only late comparison questions, and sentiment data appears from the entry plan. The entry tier covers 125 prompts across ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews and Copilot.

At $250 per month, it is a mid-market buy, not a starter tool. Large brands may still need the enterprise tier for more prompts and seats. Pick Scrunch when site fixes matter as much as tracking, since the audit work is built in rather than bolted on.

AthenaHQ stands out on model breadth, with 11 models on its Starter plan, including ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews, Gemini and Copilot among others. It also brings GA4 and Search Console data next to prompt results, so teams can compare AI visibility with organic search performance in one place. A free tier with credits lets you test before paying.

Pricing is credit-based, with 3,600 credits per month on Starter, and one credit buys one AI response, so heavy prompt lists consume credits faster than a flat prompt count suggests. At $295 per month, it suits teams that need many models and can manage a credit budget. Teams that want simple flat pricing should look at Otterly or SE Ranking Visible.

Goodie targets larger marketing teams that need multi-model brand monitoring with structured reporting. Its entry tier covers 110 prompts daily across five models, which suits a brand with a defined prompt set and a team that will act on the results weekly. Reporting is built for marketing stakeholders rather than solo operators.

The $295 per month entry price and lack of a free plan make it a poor first step for a small business. Otterly or Rankscale will prove the concept for far less. Goodie fits once AI visibility is an established reporting line and the team needs consistent multi-model coverage.

SE Ranking Visible, sold as SE Visible, gives SEO teams AI tracking without buying a standalone tool. At $99 per month, or $79 on annual billing, it covers 200 prompts across ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Perplexity and AI Overviews, with no engine add-ons on the entry plan. The source answer behind each metric helps teams verify what the AI actually said.

The catch is context: it shines inside the SE Ranking suite, where rank tracking, audits and content tools already live. A team that only wants AI visibility may prefer a focused tool. A team already paying for SE Ranking should add Visible before buying a separate platform.

Rankscale suits teams that want to pay for what they track rather than a fixed tier. Its Pro plan covers up to 10 models, including Claude, DeepSeek, Mistral and Grok alongside the major engines, and checks can run daily, weekly or monthly. That flexibility helps teams with seasonal prompts or niche engines that other tools skip.

Credit pricing means the bill depends on how many engines and checks you choose, with Claude costing more credits than most engines. API access also sits on higher tiers. If your prompt list is unusual or your cadence varies, Rankscale is worth testing on its 7-day Pro trial.

ZipTie appeals to teams that dislike per-seat billing. Its usage-based model starts from $42.75 per month, covers up to 7 engines, and never bills for seats, so a whole team can view results without multiplying the cost. You choose the prompts and cadence, and pay for what you run.

The trade is credit complexity and a smaller vendor footprint than Profound or Semrush. Teams that need procurement-friendly reporting or deep integrations should check those details on a trial. Teams that want simple, seat-free tracking will like the model.

Sona AI Visibility answers a different question from most tools here: does AI visibility turn into pipeline? It connects prompts and citations to accounts, pipeline and closed-won revenue on one timeline, and tracks AI crawler activity from server logs or an edge worker. Starter pricing starts from $75 per month billed annually, with about 56 prompts daily across three engines.

That revenue link suits B2B teams that must justify AI search spending to finance. Consumer brands with no pipeline model will get less from it. Setup also needs account and page configuration before the reporting pays off. If attribution is your gap, Sona is the most direct fix on this list.

Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit suits teams that already live in Semrush. It adds AI visibility tracking for ChatGPT, Google AI, Gemini and Perplexity to the platform's existing keyword, audit and content data, so AI results can be read next to organic rankings. Pricing is $99 per month per domain, billed annually, with a 7-day trial.

The per-domain price adds up for multi-brand teams, and the prompt allowance is smaller than SE Ranking Visible at the same headline price. Extra users also cost more. For a single-domain team already on Semrush, it is the lowest-friction alternative. For multi-domain teams, compare the per-domain total against a standalone tool first.