Best LLM Visibility Tools in 2026

Peec AI is our pick for most teams because the product is easy to explain to a non-technical stakeholder. You add prompts that buyers actually ask, pick engines, and watch brand mentions, citations, and competitor positions over time. The dashboard reads like an SEO rank tracker, which helps teams that already think in prompts and positions.

The entry plan starts at $95 per month and covers 50 prompts with a choice of engines. That prompt cap is the main limit: a team tracking many products, locations, or languages will need a higher tier quickly. If your prompt set is focused, Peec AI gives a clean, well-priced start.

Profound is the enterprise answer in this category. It tracks brand presence across many AI engines, surfaces the conversations behind the scores, and gives larger teams the analytics and API access they need to feed reporting systems. For a brand with many products and markets, that depth matters more than a low entry price.

The catch is access. Enterprise pricing is custom, so you need a sales conversation to get a firm quote, though a trial is available. Smaller teams may find the process slow and the platform larger than they need. Choose Profound when you have budget, a large prompt set, and a reporting need that a simple tracker cannot meet.

Otterly.AI is the best low-cost way to find out if LLM tracking is worth paying for. Lite starts at $29 per month billed annually, with a 7-day trial, and covers a small prompt set across several engines. For a solo marketer or a small business, that is enough to see if AI answers mention the brand at all.

The limit is scale. Fifteen prompts on the entry plan will not cover a full product catalog, and some engines sit outside the base plan. Treat Otterly.AI as a first step: prove value on your most important prompts, then move up a tier or switch tools when the prompt list grows.

Scrunch stands out because it pairs brand monitoring with crawler insight. Beyond tracking mentions, it helps teams see how AI crawlers parse their site, which can explain why a brand is missing from answers even when its web pages rank well. That technical angle suits SaaS and B2B teams with content-heavy sites.

Starter is $250 per month billed annually, with a 7-day trial. That price puts Scrunch above starter tools, and entry plans cover fewer engines than enterprise tiers. Choose Scrunch when crawler and content insight matters as much as the mention score itself.

AthenaHQ is the only tool here with a genuinely free starting tier. The Essential plan gives a small credit allowance to run real tracking before you pay, which is useful when you are still convincing a team that AI visibility matters. Paid plans cover many engines and add content and outreach layers for teams that want actions, not just scores.

Starter starts at $295 per month, so the jump from free to paid is large. The credit model also needs attention: each answer consumes credits, so a large prompt set can burn through an allowance faster than a flat prompt plan. Test the free tier first, measure credit use, and only then commit.

Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit makes sense only if your team already pays for Semrush. It adds AI visibility tracking to keyword, traffic, and content data you already use, so you can compare AI mentions with search performance in one place. That context is valuable for SEO teams that report on both channels.

The Toolkit costs $99 per month per domain on top of a Semrush plan, and the entry plan covers 25 prompts. Teams tracking many domains will see costs stack up. If you are not already a Semrush user, a standalone tracker above will usually cost less for the same prompt count.

Ahrefs Brand Radar suits teams that already live in Ahrefs. It surfaces how a brand appears in AI answers and pairs that view with the keyword and link data Ahrefs is known for. For an SEO team that already reports from Ahrefs, that single reporting home is a real convenience.

The cost is the catch. Brand Radar starts at $199 per month per platform index, with full coverage costing more, and it sits on top of a base Ahrefs plan. There is a free checker for a quick look, but no free plan for ongoing tracking. Non-Ahrefs teams should compare standalone tools first.

SE Ranking, sold in some places as SE Visible, gives mid-market teams a strong bundle. The entry plan starts at $99 per month billed annually and covers 200 prompts across 3 projects, which is more prompts per dollar than several rivals. A 10-day trial lets you test the setup before paying.

The trade-off is engine breadth. The entry set covers the major engines, but it does not match the widest standalone tools on every model. If your buyers ask questions mainly on ChatGPT and Google AI surfaces, SE Ranking is good value. If you need every engine, check the plan list carefully.

Rankscale appeals to agencies and power users who want white-label reports without an enterprise contract. Essentials is $204 per year, which works out to $17 per month billed annually, with a 7-day Pro trial. The credit model lets small teams pay for what they use, rather than a flat prompt bundle.

The catch is the same as with any credit model: you need to watch usage, because a growing prompt set or frequent refreshes can consume credits faster than expected. Rankscale is a good low-cost pick for a focused prompt set, but larger programs should compare flat prompt plans from Peec AI or SE Ranking.